Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1222

reference
666-tree-1
name
1222
tree-preservation-order

undefined

666-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.014616 50.882218)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.014587 50.882215,-1.014592 50.882225,-1.014607 50.882232,-1.014615 50.882233,-1.014632 50.882230,-1.014643 50.882221,-1.014644 50.882215,-1.014643 50.882210,-1.014639 50.882205,-1.014633 50.882201,-1.014625 50.882198,-1.014616 50.882197,-1.014599 50.882200,-1.014593 50.882204,-1.014589 50.882209,-1.014587 50.882215)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL